Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Johnson Farms Rezone and Development Agreement→At a glance
- Public comments
- 8
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Nov 5, 2025.
Public comments (8)
Expressed opposition to the rezone, stating that Southwest Orem has too much development and traffic, and that crime follows businesses.
Planning Commission - Nov 5, 2025 · 1:03:14 →Explained that family members are too old to continue farming, the land was cut off by UDOT roads, and farming is no longer financially viable.
Planning Commission - Nov 5, 2025 · 1:06:47 →Submitted a written comment stating that Southwest Orem has too much traffic and should remain farmland or low-density residential.
Planning Commission - Nov 5, 2025 · 1:09:00 →Asked for clarification on the acreage being rezoned and expressed concern about future high-rise development.
Planning Commission - Nov 5, 2025 · 1:16:44 →Expressed concern that the rezone would bring unwanted traffic and crime to Southwest Orem.
Planning Commission - Oct 15, 2025 · 0:00 →Co-owner explained that farming is no longer viable due to UDOT taking part of the land.
Planning Commission - Oct 15, 2025 · 0:00 →Expressed via written comment that Southwest Orem has too much traffic and should remain low-density.
Planning Commission - Oct 15, 2025 · 0:00 →Applicant explained that commercial use is the best fit for the triangular remnant property.
Planning Commission - Oct 15, 2025 · 0:00 →